You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A universal genomic coordinate translator for comparative genomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neda Zamani, Görel Sundström, Jennifer RS Meadows, Marc P Höppner, Jacques Dainat, Henrik Lantz, Brian J Haas, Manfred G Grabherr |
| Abstract |
Genomic duplications constitute major events in the evolution of species, allowing paralogous copies of genes to take on fine-tuned biological roles. Unambiguously identifying the orthology relationship between copies across multiple genomes can be resolved by synteny, i.e. the conserved order of genomic sequences. However, a comprehensive analysis of duplication events and their contributions to evolution would require all-to-all genome alignments, which increases at N2 with the number of available genomes, N. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Sweden | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 70 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,089,560
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#88
of 7,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,390
of 242,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#2
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.