↓ Skip to main content

Building the sugarcane genome for biotechnology and identifying evolutionary trends

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building the sugarcane genome for biotechnology and identifying evolutionary trends
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalia de Setta, Cláudia Barros Monteiro-Vitorello, Cushla Jane Metcalfe, Guilherme Marcelo Queiroga Cruz, Luiz Eduardo Del Bem, Renato Vicentini, Fábio Tebaldi Silveira Nogueira, Roberta Alvares Campos, Sideny Lima Nunes, Paula Cristina Gasperazzo Turrini, Andreia Prata Vieira, Edgar Andrés Ochoa Cruz, Tatiana Caroline Silveira Corrêa, Carlos Takeshi Hotta, Alessandro de Mello Varani, Sonia Vautrin, Adilson Silva da Trindade, Mariane de Mendonça Vilela, Carolina Gimiliani Lembke, Paloma Mieko Sato, Rodrigo Fandino de Andrade, Milton Yutaka Nishiyama, Claudio Benicio Cardoso-Silva, Katia Castanho Scortecci, Antônio Augusto Franco Garcia, Monalisa Sampaio Carneiro, Changsoo Kim, Andrew H Paterson, Hélène Bergès, Angélique D’Hont, Anete Pereira de Souza, Glaucia Mendes Souza, Michel Vincentz, João Paulo Kitajima, Marie-Anne Van Sluys

Abstract

Sugarcane is the source of sugar in all tropical and subtropical countries and is becoming increasingly important for bio-based fuels. However, its large (10 Gb), polyploid, complex genome has hindered genome based breeding efforts. Here we release the largest and most diverse set of sugarcane genome sequences to date, as part of an on-going initiative to provide a sugarcane genomic information resource, with the ultimate goal of producing a gold standard genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 11 5%
Thailand 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 186 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Researcher 41 20%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 15%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Psychology 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,778,585
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,067
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,524
of 226,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#50
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.