You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A pilot study to evaluate incorporating eye care for children into reproductive and child health services in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania: a historical comparison study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Nursing, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Milka Madaha Mafwiri, Rodrick Kisenge, Clare Elizabeth Gilbert |
Abstract |
Many blinding eye conditions of childhood are preventable or treatable, particularly in developing countries. However, primary eye care (PEC) for children is poorly developed, leading to unnecessary visual loss. Activities for control by health workers entail interventions for systemic conditions (measles, vitamin A deficiency), identification and referral of children with sight threatening conditions and health education for caregivers. This pilot study evaluated integrating a package of activities to promote child eye health into Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) services in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 40% |
Belgium | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,058,878
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#172
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,220
of 227,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.