You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional analysis of Arabidopsisimmune-related MAPKs uncovers a role for MPK3 as negative regulator of inducible defences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Frei dit Frey, Ana Victoria Garcia, Jean Bigeard, Rim Zaag, Eduardo Bueso, Marie Garmier, Stéphanie Pateyron, Marie-Ludivine de Tauzia-Moreau, Véronique Brunaud, Sandrine Balzergue, Jean Colcombet, Sébastien Aubourg, Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette, Heribert Hirt |
| Abstract |
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are key regulators of immune responses in animals and plants. In Arabidopsis, perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) activates the MAPKs MPK3, MPK4 and MPK6. Increasing information depicts the molecular events activated by MAMPs in plants, but the specific and cooperative contributions of the MAPKs in these signalling events are largely unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 26% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,269
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,353
of 241,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#54
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.