↓ Skip to main content

Human genomic regions with exceptionally high levels of population differentiation identified from 911 whole-genome sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human genomic regions with exceptionally high levels of population differentiation identified from 911 whole-genome sequences
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenza Colonna, Qasim Ayub, Yuan Chen, Luca Pagani, Pierre Luisi, Marc Pybus, Erik Garrison, Yali Xue, Chris Tyler-Smith, The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium

Abstract

Population differentiation has proved to be effective for identifying loci under geographically localized positive selection, and has the potential to identify loci subject to balancing selection. We have previously investigated the pattern of genetic differentiation among human populations at 36.8 million genomic variants to identify sites in the genome showing high frequency differences. Here, we extend this dataset to include additional variants, survey sites with low levels of differentiation, and evaluate the extent to which highly differentiated sites are likely to result from selective or other processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Brazil 4 2%
Ireland 2 1%
Finland 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 179 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Computer Science 7 4%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 21 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,405,155
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,909
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,948
of 241,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.