↓ Skip to main content

Endomyocardial biopsies in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and a common Chinese later-onset fabry mutation (IVS4 + 919G > A)

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endomyocardial biopsies in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and a common Chinese later-onset fabry mutation (IVS4 + 919G > A)
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-9-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting-Rong Hsu, Shih-Hsien Sung, Fu-Pang Chang, Chia-Feng Yang, Hao-Chuan Liu, Hsiang-Yu Lin, Chun-Kai Huang, He-Jin Gao, Yu-Hsiu Huang, Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Pi-Chang Lee, An-Hang Yang, Chuan-Chi Chiang, Ching-Yuang Lin, Wen-Chung Yu, Dau-Ming Niu

Abstract

In Taiwan, DNA-based newborn screening showed a surprisingly high incidence of a cardiac Fabry mutation (IVS4 + 919G > A). The prevalence of this mutation is too high to be believed that it is a real pathogenic mutation. The purpose of this study is to identify the cardiac pathologic characteristics in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and this mutation

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,735,942
of 21,340,745 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,524
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,448
of 202,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,340,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.