↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric properties of the mammography self-efficacy and fear of breast cancer scales in Iranian women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric properties of the mammography self-efficacy and fear of breast cancer scales in Iranian women
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4404-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahdi Moshki, Shole Shahgheibi, Parvaneh Taymoori, Amjad Moradi, Deam Roshani, Cheryl L. Holt

Abstract

Research investigating mammography screening has often reported low mammography self-efficacy and breast cancer fear contribute to underutilization of mammography. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of Champion's Mammography Self-efficacy Scale (CMSS) and Champion's Breast Cancer Fear Scale (CBCFS) in a sample of Iranian women. The adapted instruments were administered to a community sample of 482 women aged 40 years or older. They inhibited in Sanandaj, Iran. Cronbach's α coefficients, item-total, and test-retest correlations were used to assess the reliability of the scales. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to assess construct validity. The α coefficients for the Farsi 14-item CMSS and 8-item BCFS were .87 and.95, respectively. In terms of the CMSS confirmatory factor analysis, the proportion of x (2)/df was 2.4, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.93, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.96 providing a strong fit to the data induced by two-factor model. With regard to CBCFS, x (2)/df was 86.33, CFI =0.99, and TLI =0.99 supporting one-factor model. The CMSS and CBCFS exhibited strong initial psychometric properties; therefore, they are recommended to understand women's breast cancer screening behaviors better.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 21 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 50%