↓ Skip to main content

A modified TILLING approach to detect induced mutations in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A modified TILLING approach to detect induced mutations in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-9-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristobal Uauy, Francine Paraiso, Pasqualina Colasuonno, Robert K Tran, Helen Tsai, Steve Berardi, Luca Comai, Jorge Dubcovsky

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum ssp.) is an important food source for humans in many regions around the world. However, the ability to understand and modify gene function for crop improvement is hindered by the lack of available genomic resources. TILLING is a powerful reverse genetics approach that combines chemical mutagenesis with a high-throughput screen for mutations. Wheat is specially well-suited for TILLING due to the high mutation densities tolerated by polyploids, which allow for very efficient screens. Despite this, few TILLING populations are currently available. In addition, current TILLING screening protocols require high-throughput genotyping platforms, limiting their use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 264 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 26%
Student > Master 23 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Professor 12 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 217 77%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 9%
Computer Science 3 1%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 28 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,112,553
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#175
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,851
of 90,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them