You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Descriptive epidemiology of screen and non-screen sedentary time in adolescents: a cross sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-7-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim S Olds, Carol A Maher, Kate Ridley, Daniella M Kittel |
| Abstract |
Much attention has been paid to adolescents' screen time, however very few studies have examined non-screen sedentary time (NSST). This study aimed to (1) describe the magnitude and composition of screen sedentary time (SST) and NSST in Australian adolescents, (2) describe the socio-demographic correlates of SST and NSST, and (3) determine whether screen time is an adequate surrogate for total sedentary behaviour in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 16% |
| Psychology | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,906,939
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,524
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,535
of 179,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#34
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.