You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An interprofessional approach to shared decision making: an exploratory case study with family caregivers of one IP home care team
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
France Légaré, Dawn Stacey, Nathalie Brière, Hubert Robitaille, Marie-Claude Lord, Sophie Desroches, Renée Drolet |
| Abstract |
Within the context of an exploratory case study, the authors assessed the perceptions of family caregivers about the decision-making process regarding relocating their relative and about the applicability of an interprofessional approach to shared decision making (IP-SDM). They also assessed perceptions of health professionals and health managers about IP-SDM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,969,921
of 24,213,557 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,296
of 3,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,450
of 232,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,557 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.