↓ Skip to main content

The politics of agenda setting at the global level: key informant interviews regarding the International Labour Organization Decent Work Agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The politics of agenda setting at the global level: key informant interviews regarding the International Labour Organization Decent Work Agenda
Published in
Globalization and Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-10-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Di Ruggiero, Joanna E Cohen, Donald C Cole

Abstract

Global labour markets continue to undergo significant transformations resulting from socio-political instability combined with rises in structural inequality, employment insecurity, and poor working conditions. Confronted by these challenges, global institutions are providing policy guidance to protect and promote the health and well-being of workers. This article provides an account of how the International Labour Organization's Decent Work Agenda contributes to the work policy agendas of the World Health Organization and the World Bank.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#974
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,221
of 242,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.