↓ Skip to main content

Enhancement of OVA-induced murine lung eosinophilia by co-exposure to contamination levels of LPS in Asian sand dust and heated dust

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancement of OVA-induced murine lung eosinophilia by co-exposure to contamination levels of LPS in Asian sand dust and heated dust
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-10-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yahao Ren, Takamichi Ichinose, Miao He, Yuan Song, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Seiichi Yoshida, Masataka Nishikawa, Hirohisa Takano, Guifan Sun, Takayuki Shibamoto

Abstract

A previous study has shown that the aggravation of Asian sand dust (ASD) on ovalbumin (OVA)-induced lung eosinphilia was more severe in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-rich ASD than in SiO2-rich ASD. Therefore, the effects of different LPS contamination levels in ASD on the aggravation of OVA-induced lung eosinophilia were investigated in the present study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Other 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#668
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,869
of 243,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.