↓ Skip to main content

Oesophageal coins invisible on chest radiography: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oesophageal coins invisible on chest radiography: a case report
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12245-017-0153-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Takahashi, Takashi Shiga, Hiraku Funakoshi

Abstract

Coins are made of metal, which is generally radiopaque, and so physicians often have the misconception that all coins are detectable by radiography. Here, we report a case of intentionally swallowed coins in the oesophagus of an adult; the coins could not be detected on chest radiography but were detected using computed tomography (CT). A 46-year-old woman with a history of depression presented to the emergency department after an intentional medication overdose and ingestion of two Japanese 1-yen coins. She complained of persistent retrosternal discomfort. In order to confirm whether the coins were in the oesophagus or trachea, an anteroposterior chest radiograph was obtained; however, no coins were detected. Owing to her persistent symptoms, a chest CT was performed. On the initial CT scan, two 1-yen coins were observed in the oesophagus: one in the middle oesophagus and the other in the lower oesophagus. After the scanning, the patient drank water with permission, but vomited. No coins were found in her vomit, and the symptoms of retrosternal discomfort had completely disappeared. A subsequent CT scan revealed that the two 1-yen coins were in the patient's stomach. Japanese 1-yen coins are made of 100% aluminium, which is less radiopaque than the metals that make up coins (nickel, bronze, and lead), and so, they were not visible via chest radiography in our case. Detecting very small or thin radiolucent foreign bodies is not possible using a chest radiograph or contrast oesophagram, but is possible via CT. CT is both increasingly convenient and non-invasive, unlike endoscopy or bronchoscopy, and so, the use of CT scans should be considered in cases of possible radiolucent foreign body ingestion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,968,542
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#240
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,976
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.