↓ Skip to main content

The assessment, serial evaluation, and subsequent sequelae of acute kidney injury (ASSESS-AKI) study: design and methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The assessment, serial evaluation, and subsequent sequelae of acute kidney injury (ASSESS-AKI) study: design and methods
Published in
BMC Nephrology, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-11-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan S Go, Chirag R Parikh, T Alp Ikizler, Steven Coca, Edward D Siew, Vernon M Chinchilli, Chi-yuan Hsu, Amit X Garg, Michael Zappitelli, Kathleen D Liu, W Brian Reeves, Nasrollah Ghahramani, Prasad Devarajan, Georgia Brown Faulkner, Thida C Tan, Paul L Kimmel, Paul Eggers, John B Stokes, the Assessment Serial Evaluation, and Subsequent Sequelae of Acute Kidney Injury (ASSESS-AKI) Study Investigators

Abstract

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been increasing over time and is associated with a high risk of short-term death. Previous studies on hospital-acquired AKI have important methodological limitations, especially their retrospective study designs and limited ability to control for potential confounding factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,894,599
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#131
of 2,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,836
of 95,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them