↓ Skip to main content

MRSA carriage among healthcare workers in non-outbreak settings in Europe and the United States: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MRSA carriage among healthcare workers in non-outbreak settings in Europe and the United States: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeleine Dulon, Claudia Peters, Anja Schablon, Albert Nienhaus

Abstract

A recent review estimated prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare workers (HCWs) to be 4.6%. However, MRSA carriage in HCWs in non-outbreak settings is thought to be higher than in an outbreak situation, due to increased hygiene awareness in outbreaks, but valid data are missing. The goals of this paper are to summarise the prevalence of MRSA carriage amongst HCWs in non-outbreak situations and to identify occupational groups in healthcare services associated with a higher risk of MRSA colonisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,029,801
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#973
of 8,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,194
of 242,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#18
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.