You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BorreliaBase: a phylogeny-centered browser of Borrelia genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lia Di, Pedro E Pagan, Daniel Packer, Che L Martin, Saymon Akther, Girish Ramrattan, Emmanuel F Mongodin, Claire M Fraser, Steven E Schutzer, Benjamin J Luft, Sherwood R Casjens, Wei-Gang Qiu |
| Abstract |
The bacterial genus Borrelia (phylum Spirochaetes) consists of two groups of pathogens represented respectively by B. burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme borreliosis, and B. hermsii, the agent of tick-borne relapsing fever. The number of publicly available Borrelia genomic sequences is growing rapidly with the discovery and sequencing of Borrelia strains worldwide. There is however a lack of dedicated online databases to facilitate comparative analyses of Borrelia genomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,471,491
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,224
of 7,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,075
of 232,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#27
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.