You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Survival advantage of partial over radical nephrectomy in patients presenting with localized renal cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-372 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederik C Roos, Sandra Steffens, Kerstin Junker, Martin Janssen, Frank Becker, Gerd Wegener, Walburgis Brenner, Julie Steinestel, Thomas J Schnoeller, Mark Schrader, Rainer Hofmann, Joachim W Thüroff, Markus A Kuczyk, Heiko Wunderlich, Stefan Siemer, Arndt Hartmann, Michael Stöckle, Andres J Schrader, For the German Renal Cell Cancer Network |
| Abstract |
Partial nephrectomy (PN) preserves renal function and has become the standard approach for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, there is still an ongoing debate as to which patients will actually derive greater benefit from partial than from radical nephrectomy (RN). The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of the type of surgery on overall survival (OS) in patients with localized RCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,374,472
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,419
of 8,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,837
of 226,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#92
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.