You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pacemaker lead malpositioning led to subsequent ischemic strokes despite antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-9-54 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claus Rath, Martin Andreas, Caesar Khazen, Dominik Wiedemann, Andreas Habertheuer, Alfred Kocher |
Abstract |
Pacemaker lead malpositioning may lead to severe clinical adverse events. Rarely, cases of inadvertent placement of a lead into the left ventricle are reported in the literature. We herein report a case of pacemaker lead malpositioning into the left ventricle via a persistent foramen ovale in a male caucasian patient. After this procedural adverse event, the patient suffered from two ischemic strokes despite antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Librarian | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,041,143
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#723
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,949
of 228,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.