↓ Skip to main content

The effect of exercise training on clinical outcomes in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,623)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of exercise training on clinical outcomes in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12933-017-0590-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Ostman, N. A. Smart, D. Morcos, A. Duller, W. Ridley, D. Jewiss

Abstract

Purpose: to establish if exercise training improves clinical outcomes in people with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Registered with PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/Identifier:CRD42017055491 ). studies were identified through a MEDLINE search strategy (1985 to Jan 12, 2017), Cochrane controlled trials registry, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus. prospective randomized or controlled trials of exercise training in humans with metabolic syndrome, lasting 12 weeks or more. We included 16 studies with 23 intervention groups; 77,000 patient-hours of exercise training. In analyses of aerobic exercise studies versus control: body mass index was significantly reduced, mean difference (MD) -0.29 (kg m(-2)) (95% CI -0.44, -0.15, p < 0.0001); body mass was significantly reduced, MD -1.16 kg (95% CI -1.83, -0.48, p = 0.0008); waist circumference was significantly reduced MD -1.37 cm (95% CI -2.02, -0.71, p < 0.0001), peak VO2 was significantly improved MD 3.00 mL kg(-1) min(-1) (95% CI 1.92, 4.08, p < 0.000001); systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced, MD -2.54 mmHg (95% CI -4.34, -0.75, p = 0.006), and, MD -2.27 mmHg (95% CI -3.47, -1.06, p = 0.0002) respectively; fasting blood glucose was significantly reduced MD -0.16 mmol L(-1) (95% CI -0.32, -0.01, p = 0.04); triglycerides were significantly reduced MD -0.21 mmol L(-1) (95% CI -0.29, -0.13, p < 0.00001); and low density lipoprotein was significantly reduced MD -0.03 mmol L(-1) (95% CI -0.05, -0.00, p = 0.02). In analyses of combined exercise versus control: waist circumference, MD -3.80 cm (95% CI -5.65, -1.95, p < 0.0001); peak VO2 MD 4.64 mL kg(-1) min(-1) (95% CI 2.42, 6.87, p < 0.0001); systolic blood pressure MD -3.79 mmHg (95% CI -6.18, -1.40, p = 0.002); and high density lipoprotein (HDL) MD 0.14 (95% CI 0.04, 0.25, p = 0.009) were all significantly improved. We found no significant differences between outcome measures between the two exercise interventions. Exercise training improves body composition, cardiovascular, and, metabolic outcomes in people with metabolic syndrome. For some outcome measures, isolated aerobic exercise appears optimal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 358 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 17%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 128 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 20%
Sports and Recreations 53 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 146 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,129,125
of 25,203,135 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#47
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,600
of 321,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,203,135 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.