↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric surgery: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric surgery: a retrospective study
Published in
BMC Surgery, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-14-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takanobu Yamada, Tsutomu Hayashi, Toru Aoyama, Junya Shirai, Hirohito Fujikawa, Haruhiko Cho, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda, Hideki Taniguchi, Ryoji Fukushima, Akira Tsuburaya

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been reported to be feasible and useful for maintaining physiological function and facilitating recovery after colorectal surgery. The feasibility of such programs in gastric surgery remains unclear. This study assessed whether an ERAS program is feasible in patients who undergo gastric surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 17 32%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 53%
Unspecified 7 13%
Computer Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#377
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,280
of 225,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.