↓ Skip to main content

High levels of effective long-distance dispersal may blur ecotypic divergence in a rare terrestrial orchid

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High levels of effective long-distance dispersal may blur ecotypic divergence in a rare terrestrial orchid
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-14-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

An Vanden Broeck, Wouter Van Landuyt, Karen Cox, Luc De Bruyn, Ralf Gyselings, Gerard Oostermeijer, Bertille Valentin, Gregor Bozic, Branko Dolinar, Zoltán Illyés, Joachim Mergeay

Abstract

Gene flow and adaptive divergence are key aspects of metapopulation dynamics and ecological speciation. Long-distance dispersal is hard to detect and few studies estimate dispersal in combination with adaptive divergence. The aim of this study was to investigate effective long-distance dispersal and adaptive divergence in the fen orchid (Liparis loeselii (L.) Rich.). We used amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)-based assignment tests to quantify effective long-distance dispersal at two different regions in Northwest Europe. In addition, genomic divergence between fen orchid populations occupying two distinguishable habitats, wet dune slacks and alkaline fens, was investigated by a genome scan approach at different spatial scales (continental, landscape and regional) and based on 451 AFLP loci.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 47%
Environmental Science 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 18%