↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative reproducibility analysis for identifying reproducible targets from high-throughput experiments

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative reproducibility analysis for identifying reproducible targets from high-throughput experiments
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12918-017-0444-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenfei Zhang, Ying Liu, Mindy Zhang, Cheng Zhu, Yuefeng Lu

Abstract

High-throughput assays are widely used in biological research to select potential targets. One single high-throughput experiment can efficiently study a large number of candidates simultaneously, but is subject to substantial variability. Therefore it is scientifically important to performance quantitative reproducibility analysis to identify reproducible targets with consistent and significant signals across replicate experiments. A few methods exist, but all have limitations. In this paper, we propose a new method for identifying reproducible targets. Considering a Bayesian hierarchical model, we show that the test statistics from replicate experiments follow a mixture of multivariate Gaussian distributions, with the one component with zero-mean representing the irreproducible targets. A target is thus classified as reproducible or irreproducible based on its posterior probability belonging to the reproducible components. We study the performance of our proposed method using simulations and a real data example. The proposed method is shown to have favorable performance in identifying reproducible targets compared to other methods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%