↓ Skip to main content

Low birth weight and environmental tobacco smoke increases the risk of wheezing in adolescents: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low birth weight and environmental tobacco smoke increases the risk of wheezing in adolescents: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng-Hung Lin, James L Caffrey, Yu-Sheng Lin, Pau-Chung Chen, Ching-Chun Lin, Wen-Chao Ho, Trong-Neng Wu, Ruey-Shiung Lin

Abstract

Low birth weight (LBW) and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure are each associated with wheezing in children. This study was designed to examine the combined association of LBW and ETS with wheezing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,410,148
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,521
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,387
of 227,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#195
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.