Title |
No global consensus: a cross-sectional survey of maternal weight policies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-167 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Courtney Scott, Christopher T Andersen, Natali Valdez, Francisco Mardones, Ellen A Nohr, Lucilla Poston, Katharina C Quack Loetscher, Barbara Abrams |
Abstract |
Growing evidence suggests that maternal prepregnancy weight and gestational weight gain are risk factors for perinatal complications and subsequent maternal and child health. Postpartum weight retention is also associated with adverse birth outcomes and maternal obesity. Clinical guidelines addressing healthy weight before, during, and after pregnancy have been introduced in some countries, but at present a systematic accounting for these policies has not been conducted. The objective of the present study was to conduct a cross-national comparison of maternal weight guidelines. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
Other | 29 | 20% |
Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 46 | 32% |