You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotypic prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases among enterobacteriaceae isolated at Mulago National Referral Hospital: Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-017-2786-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas Ampaire, Emmanuel Nduhura, Izale Wewedru |
| Abstract |
Enterobacteriaceae, common causes of health care associated and community acquired infections are mainly treated with beta-lactam agents. Our study objective was to determine the prevalence and common enterobacteriaceae pathogen producing extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLs). The isolates were recovered from various clinical specimens. This was cross sectional study conducted between July 2016 and September 2016 at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda. We used ChromID™ ESBL agar (Biomerieux SA, Lyon, France) and Vitek2 compact system GN83 card (BioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, Missouri, USA) to detect and confirm presence of phenotypic extended spectrum beta lactamases producing pathogens respectively. Of the 261 tested clinical isolates, 35 (13.4%) were identified as ESBLs producing bacteria. Escherichia coli predominated in the samples [18 (51.4%)], presenting the highest frequency of ESBLs producing, followed by Klebsiella pneumonia [10 (28.5%)], Proteus mirabilis [4 (11.4%)], Enterobacter sp. [2 (5.7%)] and least among Acinetobacter baumanii [1 (2.8%)]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,579
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,643
of 315,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#98
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.