↓ Skip to main content

Identifying key domains of health-related quality of life for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: the patient perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying key domains of health-related quality of life for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: the patient perspective
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12955-014-0106-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muirne CS Paap, Christina Bode, Lonneke IM Lenferink, Lianne C Groen, Caroline B Terwee, Sara Ahmed, Owis Eilayyan, Job van der Palen

Abstract

Numerous instruments are available to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), covering a wide array of domains ranging from symptoms such as dyspnea, cough and wheezing, to social and emotional functioning. Currently no information or guide is available yet to aid the selection of domains for a particular study or disease population. The aim of this paper is to identify which domains of HRQoL are most important with respect to COPD, from the patient perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 3%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Psychology 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#12,900,601
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#964
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,195
of 225,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.