You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5 T using balanced SSFP and 40 ms resolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dirk Voit, Shuo Zhang, Christina Unterberg-Buchwald, Jan M Sohns, Joachim Lotz, Jens Frahm |
| Abstract |
While cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) commonly employs ECG-synchronized cine acquisitions with balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) contrast at 1.5 T, recent developments at 3 T demonstrate significant potential for T1-weighted real-time imaging at high spatiotemporal resolution using undersampled radial FLASH. The purpose of this work was to combine both ideas and to evaluate a corresponding real-time CMR method at 1.5 T with SSFP contrast. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Engineering | 18 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,345,004
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,166
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,295
of 212,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.