You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roy W Batterham, Rachelle Buchbinder, Alison Beauchamp, Sarity Dodson, Gerald R Elsworth, Richard H Osborne |
| Abstract |
Health literacy is a multi-dimensional concept comprising a range of cognitive, affective, social, and personal skills and attributes. This paper describes the research and development protocol for a large communities-based collaborative project in Victoria, Australia that aims to identify and respond to health literacy issues for people with chronic conditions. The project, called Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) Victoria, is a partnership between two universities, eight service organisations and the Victorian Government. Based on the identified issues, it will develop and pilot health literacy interventions across eight disparate health services to inform the creation of a health literacy response framework to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 52 | 32% |
| Australia | 15 | 9% |
| United States | 9 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 23% |
| Scientists | 31 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 22% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 13% |
| Psychology | 22 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#341,987
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#297
of 16,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,869
of 231,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.