↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
165 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694
Pubmed ID
25002024
Authors

Roy W Batterham, Rachelle Buchbinder, Alison Beauchamp, Sarity Dodson, Gerald R Elsworth, Richard H Osborne

Abstract

Health literacy is a multi-dimensional concept comprising a range of cognitive, affective, social, and personal skills and attributes. This paper describes the research and development protocol for a large communities-based collaborative project in Victoria, Australia that aims to identify and respond to health literacy issues for people with chronic conditions. The project, called Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) Victoria, is a partnership between two universities, eight service organisations and the Victorian Government. Based on the identified issues, it will develop and pilot health literacy interventions across eight disparate health services to inform the creation of a health literacy response framework to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
North Macedonia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 313 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Researcher 31 10%
Other 23 7%
Other 83 26%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 17%
Social Sciences 43 13%
Psychology 21 7%
Unspecified 10 3%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 64 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#317,242
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#265
of 15,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,771
of 228,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.