↓ Skip to main content

The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
171 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy W Batterham, Rachelle Buchbinder, Alison Beauchamp, Sarity Dodson, Gerald R Elsworth, Richard H Osborne

Abstract

Health literacy is a multi-dimensional concept comprising a range of cognitive, affective, social, and personal skills and attributes. This paper describes the research and development protocol for a large communities-based collaborative project in Victoria, Australia that aims to identify and respond to health literacy issues for people with chronic conditions. The project, called Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy) Victoria, is a partnership between two universities, eight service organisations and the Victorian Government. Based on the identified issues, it will develop and pilot health literacy interventions across eight disparate health services to inform the creation of a health literacy response framework to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
North Macedonia 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Researcher 28 11%
Other 19 7%
Other 68 27%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 20%
Social Sciences 35 14%
Psychology 20 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 33 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#233,164
of 19,152,115 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#197
of 12,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,426
of 198,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,152,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them