You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of neck strength training on health-related quality of life in females with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-8-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petri K Salo, Arja H Häkkinen, Hannu Kautiainen, Jari J Ylinen |
| Abstract |
Chronic neck pain is a common condition associated not only with a decrease in neck muscle strength, but also with decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While neck strength training has been shown to be effective in improving neck muscle strength and reducing neck pain, HRQoL among patients with neck pain has been reported as an outcome in only two short-term exercise intervention studies. Thus, reports on the influence of a long-term neck strength training intervention on HRQoL among patients with chronic neck pain have been lacking. This study reports the effect of one-year neck strength training on HRQoL in females with chronic neck pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 88 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,760,313
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#610
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,527
of 103,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.