↓ Skip to main content

Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Zoller, Barbara Maier, Cyrill Hornuss, Christina Neugebauer, Gundula Döbbeler, Dorothea Nagel, Lesca Miriam Holdt, Mathias Bruegel, Thomas Weig, Béatrice Grabein, Lorenz Frey, Daniel Teupser, Michael Vogeser, Johannes Zander

Abstract

Severe infections in intensive care patients show high morbidity and mortality rates. Linezolid is an antimicrobial drug frequently used in critically ill patients. Recent data indicates that there might be high variability of linezolid serum concentrations in intensive care patients receiving standard doses. This study was aimed to evaluate whether standard dosing of linezolid leads to therapeutic serum concentrations in critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Other 17 14%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,475,150
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,376
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,938
of 240,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.