You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13984 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Zoller, Barbara Maier, Cyrill Hornuss, Christina Neugebauer, Gundula Döbbeler, Dorothea Nagel, Lesca Miriam Holdt, Mathias Bruegel, Thomas Weig, Béatrice Grabein, Lorenz Frey, Daniel Teupser, Michael Vogeser, Johannes Zander |
Abstract |
Severe infections in intensive care patients show high morbidity and mortality rates. Linezolid is an antimicrobial drug frequently used in critically ill patients. Recent data indicates that there might be high variability of linezolid serum concentrations in intensive care patients receiving standard doses. This study was aimed to evaluate whether standard dosing of linezolid leads to therapeutic serum concentrations in critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 32% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,475,150
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,376
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,938
of 240,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.