↓ Skip to main content

Genome and transcriptome sequencing identifies breeding targets in the orphan crop tef (Eragrostis tef)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome and transcriptome sequencing identifies breeding targets in the orphan crop tef (Eragrostis tef)
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gina Cannarozzi, Sonia Plaza-Wüthrich, Korinna Esfeld, Stéphanie Larti, Yi Song Wilson, Dejene Girma, Edouard de Castro, Solomon Chanyalew, Regula Blösch, Laurent Farinelli, Eric Lyons, Michel Schneider, Laurent Falquet, Cris Kuhlemeier, Kebebew Assefa, Zerihun Tadele

Abstract

Tef (Eragrostis tef), an indigenous cereal critical to food security in the Horn of Africa, is rich in minerals and protein, resistant to many biotic and abiotic stresses and safe for diabetics as well as sufferers of immune reactions to wheat gluten. We present the genome of tef, the first species in the grass subfamily Chloridoideae and the first allotetraploid assembled de novo. We sequenced the tef genome for marker-assisted breeding, to shed light on the molecular mechanisms conferring tef's desirable nutritional and agronomic properties, and to make its genome publicly available as a community resource.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,931,363
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#468
of 10,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,311
of 230,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.