You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of the 2010 task force criteria on reclassification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ting Liu, Amit Pursnani, Umesh C Sharma, Yongkasem Vorasettakarnkij, Daniel Verdini, Peerawut Deeprasertkul, Ashley M Lee, Heidi Lumish, Manavjot S Sidhu, Hector Medina, Stephan Danik, Suhny Abbara, Godtfred Holmvang, Udo Hoffmann, Brian B Ghoshhajra |
Abstract |
We sought to evaluate the effect of application of the revised 2010 Task Force Criteria (TFC) on the prevalence of major and minor Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) criteria for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) versus application of the original 1994 TFC. We also assessed the utility of MRI to identify alternative diagnoses for patients referred for ARVC evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
El Salvador | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 27% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 61% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,426,535
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#565
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,457
of 242,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.