You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of gender and professional education on attitudes towards financial incentives for organ donation: results of a survey among 755 students of medicine and economics in Germany
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-56 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Inthorn, Sabine Wöhlke, Fabian Schmidt, Silke Schicktanz |
Abstract |
There is an ongoing expert debate with regard to financial incentives in order to increase organ supply. However, there is a lacuna of empirical studies on whether citizens would actually support financial incentives for organ donation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Senegal | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 24% |
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,732,459
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#770
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,879
of 234,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.