↓ Skip to main content

New strategy to control cell migration and metastasis regulated by CCN2/CTGF

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New strategy to control cell migration and metastasis regulated by CCN2/CTGF
Published in
Cancer Cell International, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2867-14-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Pinheiro Aguiar, Gabriel Correa de Farias, Eduardo Branco de Sousa, Juliana de Mattos Coelho-Aguiar, Julie Calixto Lobo, Priscila Ladeira Casado, Maria Eugênia Leite Duarte, José Garcia Ribeiro Abreu

Abstract

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)/CCN family member 2 (CCN2) is a CCN family member of matricellular signaling modulators. It has been shown that CCN2/CTGF mediates cell adhesion, aggregation and migration in a large variety of cell types, including vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, aortic smooth muscle and also pluripotent stem cells. Others matricellular proteins are capable of interacting with CCN2/CTGF to mediate its function. Cell migration is a key feature for tumor cell invasion and metastasis. CCN2/CTGF seems to be a prognostic marker for cancer. In addition, here we intend to discuss recent discoveries and a new strategy to develop therapies against CCN2/CTGF, in order to treat cancer metastasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,597,341
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#319
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,802
of 226,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.