↓ Skip to main content

Growth effects of exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa: the cluster-randomised PROMISE EBF trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth effects of exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa: the cluster-randomised PROMISE EBF trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv Engebretsen, Debra Jackson, Lars Thore Fadnes, Victoria Nankabirwa, Abdoulaye Hama Diallo, Tanya Doherty, Carl Lombard, Sonja Swanvelder, Jolly Nankunda, Vundli Ramokolo, David Sanders, Henry Wamani, Nicolas Meda, James K Tumwine, Eva-Charlotte Ekström, Philippe Van de Perre, Chipepo Kankasa, Halvor Sommerfelt, Thorkild Tylleskär

Abstract

In this multi-country cluster-randomized behavioural intervention trial promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in Africa, we compared growth of infants up to 6 months of age living in communities where peer counsellors promoted EBF with growth in those infants living in control communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 15 5%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 86 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 18%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 99 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,718,963
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,998
of 15,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,271
of 229,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#78
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.