You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcome prediction in sepsis: Speckle tracking echocardiography based assessment of myocardial function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13987 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sam R Orde, Juan N Pulido, Mitsuru Masaki, Shane Gillespie, Jocelyn N Spoon, Garvan C Kane, Jae K Oh |
| Abstract |
Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a relatively novel and sensitive method for assessing ventricular function and may unmask myocardial dysfunction not appreciated with conventional echocardiography. The association of ventricular dysfunction and prognosis in sepsis is unclear. We sought to evaluate frequency and prognostic value of biventricular function, assessed by STE in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 7% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,521,255
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,319
of 6,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,683
of 242,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.