↓ Skip to main content

Statins and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: cohort study using the UK clinical practice pesearch datalink

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statins and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: cohort study using the UK clinical practice pesearch datalink
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Filipa Macedo, Ian Douglas, Liam Smeeth, Harriet Forbes, Shah Ebrahim

Abstract

There is strong evidence of reductions in major vascular events from statins across all cardiovascular risk categories. However, trials of statin therapy have provided conflicting results regarding statin use and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We aimed to assess the effect of statins on T2DM development.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,059,951
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#73
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,396
of 242,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.