↓ Skip to main content

Perceived unfairness in working conditions: The case of public health services in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived unfairness in working conditions: The case of public health services in Tanzania
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nils Gunnar Songstad, Ole Bjørn Rekdal, Deodatus Amadeus Massay, Astrid Blystad

Abstract

The focus on the determinants of the quality of health services in low-income countries is increasing. Health workers' motivation has emerged as a topic of substantial interest in this context. The main objective of this article is to explore health workers' experience of working conditions, linked to motivation to work. Working conditions have been pointed out as a key factor in ensuring a motivated and well performing staff. The empirical focus is on rural public health services in Tanzania. The study aims to situate the results in a broader historical context in order to enhance our understanding of the health worker discourse on working conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 22%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 26%
Social Sciences 32 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 37 20%