↓ Skip to main content

Identifying factors for job motivation of rural health workers in North Viet Nam

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying factors for job motivation of rural health workers in North Viet Nam
Published in
Human Resources for Health, November 2003
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-1-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjolein Dieleman, Pham Viet Cuong, Le Vu Anh, Tim Martineau

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Viet Nam, most of the public health staff (84%) currently works in rural areas, where 80% of the people live. To provide good quality health care services, it is important to develop strategies influencing staff motivation for better performance. METHOD: An exploratory qualitative research was carried out among health workers in two provinces in North Viet Nam so as to identify entry points for developing strategies that improve staff performance in rural areas. The study aimed to determine the major motivating factors and it is the first in Viet Nam that looks at health workers' job perception and motivation. Apart from health workers, managers at national and at provincial level were interviewed as well as some community representatives. RESULTS: The study showed that motivation is influenced by both financial and non-financial incentives. The main motivating factors for health workers were appreciation by managers, colleagues and the community, a stable job and income and training. The main discouraging factors were related to low salaries and difficult working conditions. CONCLUSION: Activities associated with appreciation such as performance management are currently not optimally implemented, as health workers perceive supervision as control, selection for training as unclear and unequal, and performance appraisal as not useful. The kind of non-financial incentives identified should be taken into consideration when developing HRM strategies. Areas for further studies are identified.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Uganda 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 412 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 24%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 8%
Researcher 34 8%
Lecturer 32 7%
Other 84 20%
Unknown 89 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 25%
Social Sciences 62 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 41 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 3%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 103 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#627
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,442
of 57,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.