↓ Skip to main content

Cholera outbreaks (2012) in three districts of Nepal reveal clonal transmission of multi-drug resistant Vibrio choleraeO1

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cholera outbreaks (2012) in three districts of Nepal reveal clonal transmission of multi-drug resistant Vibrio choleraeO1
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameer M Dixit, Fatema-Tuz Johura, Sulochana Manandhar, Abdus Sadique, Rajesh M Rajbhandari, Shahnewaj B Mannan, Mahamud-ur Rashid, Saiful Islam, Dibesh Karmacharya, Haruo Watanabe, R Bradley Sack, Alejandro Cravioto, Munirul Alam

Abstract

Although endemic cholera causes significant morbidity and mortality each year in Nepal, lack of information about the causal bacterium often hinders cholera intervention and prevention. In 2012, diarrheal outbreaks affected three districts of Nepal with confirmed cases of mortality. This study was designed to understand the drug response patterns, source, and transmission of Vibrio cholerae associated with 2012 cholera outbreaks in Nepal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,529,977
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#752
of 8,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,261
of 242,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#15
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.