↓ Skip to main content

Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-managed therapies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Efficacy Trial (OCTET) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of self-managed therapies: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith Gellatly, Peter Bower, Dean McMillan, Christopher Roberts, Sarah Byford, Penny Bee, Simon Gilbody, Catherine Arundel, Gillian Hardy, Michael Barkham, Shirley Reynolds, Lina Gega, Patricia Mottram, Nicola Lidbetter, Rebecca Pedley, Emily Peckham, Janice Connell, Jo Molle, Neil O’Leary, Karina Lovell

Abstract

UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) specify recommendations for the treatment and management of OCD using a stepped care approach. Steps three to six of this model recommend treatment options for people with OCD that range from low-intensity guided self-help (GSH) to more intensive psychological and pharmacological interventions. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), including exposure and response prevention, is the recommended psychological treatment. However, whilst there is some preliminary evidence that self-managed therapy packages for OCD can be effective, a more robust evidence base of their clinical and cost effectiveness and acceptability is required.Methods/design: Our proposed study will test two different self-help treatments for OCD: 1) computerised CBT (cCBT) using OCFighter, an internet-delivered OCD treatment package; and 2) GSH using a book. Both treatments will be accompanied by email or telephone support from a mental health professional. We will evaluate the effectiveness, cost and patient and health professional acceptability of the treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 43 25%