You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The neural correlates of visuo-spatial working memory in children with autism spectrum disorder: effects of cognitive load
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-6-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa M Vogan, Benjamin R Morgan, Wayne Lee, Tamara L Powell, Mary Lou Smith, Margot J Taylor |
| Abstract |
Research on the neural bases of cognitive deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has shown that working memory (WM) difficulties are associated with abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex. However, cognitive load impacts these findings, and no studies have examined the relation between WM load and neural underpinnings in children with ASD. Thus, the current study determined the effects of cognitive load on WM, using a visuo-spatial WM capacity task in children with and without ASD with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,426,570
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#342
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,039
of 228,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.