You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of biochemical markers in the early post-burn period for predicting acute kidney injury and mortality in patients with major burn injury: comparison of serum creatinine, serum cystatin-C, plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hyeong Tae Yang, Haejun Yim, Yong Suk Cho, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Jong Hyun Kim, Wook Chun, Hyun Soo Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Comoros | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,507,658
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,505
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,378
of 244,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#48
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.