You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Albumin administration in the acutely ill: what is new and where next?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13991 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Louis Vincent, James A Russell, Matthias Jacob, Greg Martin, Bertrand Guidet, Jan Wernerman, Ricard Ferrer Roca, Stuart A McCluskey, Luciano Gattinoni |
| Abstract |
Albumin solutions have been used worldwide for the treatment of critically ill patients since they became commercially available in the 1940s. However, their use has become the subject of criticism and debate in more recent years. Importantly, all fluid solutions have potential benefits and drawbacks. Large multicenter randomized studies have provided valuable data regarding the safety of albumin solutions, and have begun to clarify which groups of patients are most likely to benefit from their use. However, many questions remain related to where exactly albumin fits within our fluid choices. Here, we briefly summarize some of the physiology and history of albumin use in intensive care before offering some evidence-based guidance for albumin use in critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Spain | 5 | 25% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 309 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 11% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 83 | 26% |
| Unknown | 75 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 58% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,816,610
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,597
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,617
of 242,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.