You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sustaining clinician penetration, attitudes and knowledge in cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0089-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M Edmunds, Kendra L Read, Vanesa A Ringle, Douglas M Brodman, Philip C Kendall, Rinad S Beidas |
| Abstract |
Questions remain regarding the sustainment of evidence-based practices following implementation. The present study examined the sustainment of community clinicians' implementation (i.e., penetration) of cognitive-behavioral therapy, attitudes toward evidence-based practices, and knowledge of cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety two years following training and consultation in cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,406,741
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#942
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,094
of 204,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.