↓ Skip to main content

Tissue-specific DNA methylation is conserved across human, mouse, and rat, and driven by primary sequence conservation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tissue-specific DNA methylation is conserved across human, mouse, and rat, and driven by primary sequence conservation
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12864-017-4115-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Zhou, Renee L. Sears, Xiaoyun Xing, Bo Zhang, Daofeng Li, Nicole B. Rockweiler, Hyo Sik Jang, Mayank N.K. Choudhary, Hyung Joo Lee, Rebecca F. Lowdon, Jason Arand, Brianne Tabers, C. Charles Gu, Theodore J. Cicero, Ting Wang

Abstract

Uncovering mechanisms of epigenome evolution is an essential step towards understanding the evolution of different cellular phenotypes. While studies have confirmed DNA methylation as a conserved epigenetic mechanism in mammalian development, little is known about the conservation of tissue-specific genome-wide DNA methylation patterns. Using a comparative epigenomics approach, we identified and compared the tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns of rat against those of mouse and human across three shared tissue types. We confirmed that tissue-specific differentially methylated regions are strongly associated with tissue-specific regulatory elements. Comparisons between species revealed that at a minimum 11-37% of tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are conserved, a phenomenon that we define as epigenetic conservation. Conserved DNA methylation is accompanied by conservation of other epigenetic marks including histone modifications. Although a significant amount of locus-specific methylation is epigenetically conserved, the majority of tissue-specific DNA methylation is not conserved across the species and tissue types that we investigated. Examination of the genetic underpinning of epigenetic conservation suggests that primary sequence conservation is a driving force behind epigenetic conservation. In contrast, evolutionary dynamics of tissue-specific DNA methylation are best explained by the maintenance or turnover of binding sites for important transcription factors. Our study extends the limited literature of comparative epigenomics and suggests a new paradigm for epigenetic conservation without genetic conservation through analysis of transcription factor binding sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Computer Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,363,636
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,729
of 10,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,753
of 315,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#106
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.