↓ Skip to main content

Protocol: systematic review of the association between socio-economic status and survival in adult head and neck cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol: systematic review of the association between socio-economic status and survival in adult head and neck cancer
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0545-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bilal G. Taib, Joseph Rylands, Sue Povall, Terry M. Jones, David Taylor-Robinson

Abstract

Head and neck cancer incidence is increasing worldwide. Despite overall improvements in survival, numerous studies suggest worse survival in more disadvantaged populations; however, this literature has not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this review is to investigate whether lower compared to higher socioeconomic status (SES) influences survival in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) and explore possible explanations for any relationship found. A systematic strategy will be used to identify articles, appraise their quality and extract data. Online databases including MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, ESBCO Host and Scopus will be used to locate observational studies of adults with a primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer in EU15+ countries (15 members of the EU, Australia, Canada, Norway, USA and New Zealand) where the outcomes report associations between SES and survival. This will be augmented by searching for grey literature and through reference lists. Data will be extracted using a standardised form. Study quality will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale and where possible meta-analysis of the pooled data will be conducted. This review will quantify the association between SES and survival outcomes for adult head and neck cancer patients in developed countries. The results will help identify gaps in the literature and therefore direct further novel research in the field. Ultimately, this will inform public policy and strategies to reduce the inequalities in HNSCC survival. PROSPERO CRD42016037019 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 43%