↓ Skip to main content

A peptide fragment from the human COX3 protein disrupts association of Mycobacterium tuberculosisvirulence proteins ESAT-6 and CFP10, inhibits mycobacterial growth and mounts protective immune…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A peptide fragment from the human COX3 protein disrupts association of Mycobacterium tuberculosisvirulence proteins ESAT-6 and CFP10, inhibits mycobacterial growth and mounts protective immune response
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachin Kumar Samuchiwal, Sultan Tousif, Dhiraj Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar, Anamika Ghosh, Kuhulika Bhalla, Prem Prakash, Sushil Kumar, Maitree Bhattacharyya, Prashini Moodley, Gobardhan Das, Anand Ranganathan

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases affecting millions worldwide. The currently available anti-TB drugs and vaccines have proved insufficient to contain this scourge, necessitating an urgent need for identification of novel drug targets and therapeutic strategies. The disruption of crucial protein-protein interactions, especially those that are responsible for virulence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis - for example the ESAT-6:CFP10 complex - are a worthy pursuit in this direction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 4%
India 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,887,381
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,689
of 7,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,282
of 230,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#56
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.