↓ Skip to main content

Non typable-Haemophilus influenzae biofilm formation and acute otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non typable-Haemophilus influenzae biofilm formation and acute otitis media
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Assaf Mizrahi, Robert Cohen, Emmanuelle Varon, Stephane Bonacorsi, Stephane Bechet, Claire Poyart, Corinne Levy, Josette Raymond

Abstract

Non-typable Haemophilus influenzae (NT-Hi) infection is frequently associated with acute otitis media (AOM) treatment failure, recurrence or chronic otitis media. Persistence of otopathogens in a biofilm-structured community was implicated in these situations. Here, we compared biofilm production by H. influenzae strains obtained by culture of middle ear fluid (MEF) from children with AOM treatment failure and by strains isolated from nasopharyngeal (NP) samples from healthy children or those with AOM (first episode or recurrence). We aimed to evaluate an association of clinical signs and in vitro biofilm formation and establish risk factors of carrying a biofilm-producing strain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,017
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,760
of 7,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,364
of 228,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#85
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.