↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide identification of pathogenicity factors of the free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide identification of pathogenicity factors of the free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise C Zysset-Burri, Norbert Müller, Christian Beuret, Manfred Heller, Nadia Schürch, Bruno Gottstein, Matthias Wittwer

Abstract

The free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri is the causative agent of the rapidly progressing and typically fatal primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) in humans. Despite the devastating nature of this disease, which results in > 97% mortality, knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms of the amoeba is incomplete. This work presents a comparative proteomic approach based on an experimental model in which the pathogenic potential of N. fowleri trophozoites is influenced by the compositions of different media.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,387,403
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#290
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,818
of 228,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#6
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.